🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear discussions with Washington on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy produced results, and revealed recent overtures had come from mediators to resume discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a difficult path since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been destroyed. Following this, European countries employed their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Status

Iranian officials said the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in some form if negotiations resume.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting clear proposals from Washington either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, intended to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of global regulations, Araghchi said the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be settled by armed force. He said the attacks began with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Primary Answer

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to dictate their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be alive and stays the final answer to resolve disagreements, but its standards, regulations and principles must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the identical tone."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this war. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is important is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have developed stronger, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the nation in the wake of this assault."